Colnago Y1Rs vs Cervelo S5: Aero Superbike Head-to-Head

Colnago Y1Rs vs Cervelo S5: Aero Superbike Head-to-Head

Colnago Y1Rs vs Cervelo S5: Aero Superbike Head-to-Head

Tadej Pogacar sealed a record-equalling fifth Tour de France on 26 July 2026 aboard the Colnago Y1Rs. Three months earlier, Wout van Aert beat him in the Roubaix velodrome on a Cervelo S5. So the Colnago Y1Rs vs Cervelo S5 question now has a full race season behind it, and something even more useful: both bikes have finally been through the same independent wind tunnels. That changes what a comparison like this can be. Instead of trading marketing claims, we can give you real watts, real weights, full mid-2026 US and EU pricing, and a verdict you can actually shop with. If you're cross-shopping two $14,000 superbikes, this is the head-to-head the launch coverage couldn't write.

Key takeaways

- Bike-only aero is a statistical tie. TOUR Magazin's 2026 wind tunnel ranking measured both at 204 W at 45 km/h. Cyclingnews Labs got Y1Rs 64.66 W vs S5 65.06 W at 40 km/h, inside the margin of error.

- With a rider aboard, the S5 was faster, by 3.66 W at 40 km/h in Cyclingnews' test. That run was the fastest bike-plus-rider result the publication had ever recorded.

- The S5 is the better value. Its frameset costs about $1,000 less ($6,500 vs $7,500), complete builds run 100–220 g lighter, and at the same £12,000 test price it included a power meter and higher-grade wheels.

- The Y1Rs is the more radical machine: lighter bare frame (965 g), sharper agility, Campagnolo Super Record 13 availability, and it's the bike under Pogacar's 2026 Tour, Milan–San Remo, Flanders and Liège wins.

- Fit trap: the Y1Rs' forward-swept cockpit behaves like a ~140 mm stem. Size it from the hood position, never from frame reach.

Quick Verdict: Y1Rs vs S5 at a Glance

If you only read one section, read this. Without a rider, these bikes are effectively inseparable in the wind tunnel. Put a rider aboard and the Cervelo S5 edges ahead. It is also lighter in comparable retail builds, cheaper at every tier, clears bigger tires, and won BikeRadar's direct head-to-head as its 2025 Race Bike of the Year. The Colnago Y1Rs counters with a lighter bare frame, sharper handling, genuine exclusivity, and the best palmarès in modern cycling. Put bluntly: the S5 is the smarter purchase, the Y1Rs is the more desirable object, and both are Grand Tour-proven.

Colnago Y1Rs Cervelo S5 (2026)
Claimed frame weight 965 g (M, unpainted) 1,006 g
Measured complete builds 7.44–7.68 kg 7.44–7.53 kg
TOUR tunnel, 45 km/h (bike only) 204 W 204 W
Cyclingnews, 40 km/h (bike only) 64.66 W 65.06 W
Cyclingnews, 40 km/h (with rider) 276.78 W 273.12 W
Max tire clearance 32 mm 34 mm
Frameset price (mid-2026) $7,500 / ~€6,710 $6,500 / €5,999
Top complete build up to $18,399 $14,100–$14,250
Cheapest complete build ~$14,329 ~$8,500 (Ultegra Di2)
Sizes 5 (XS–XL) 6 (48–61 cm)
Headline 2026 wins Tour de France, MSR, Flanders, Liège Paris–Roubaix, Tour TTT + first yellow
BikeRadar head-to-head Runner-up Winner (Race Bike of the Year)

What's New in 2026

The timeline matters here, because these two platforms are at different points in their life cycles. The Y1Rs was unveiled on 9 December 2024 at UAE Team Emirates' Spanish training camp and reached retail around March–April 2025. It carries into 2026 completely unchanged. No new generation, no running updates. What has changed is the price: the frameset kit launched at $6,750 and now commonly sells for $7,500 at US dealers.

The S5 is the newer design. The current generation broke cover on 8 July 2025, mid-Tour de France, sold as a model-year 2026 bike. Cervelo exploited the UCI's relaxed 8:1 tube-profile rules to cut a deeper head tube and fork, added the new HB19 one-piece cockpit, and claims the package is 6.3 W faster at 50 km/h and 124 g lighter (frame, cockpit and post system) than the outgoing S5. Roughly 100 g of that saving and about 1 W of the aero gain come from the HB19 bar alone.

The other big 2026 development is independent data. TOUR Magazin's 2026 aero ranking, run in the GST wind tunnel at 45 km/h with no rider, put the Y1Rs and S5 in a dead tie at 204 W. Two wrinkles are worth knowing. First, TOUR measured the previous S5 at 202 W, so it could not confirm Cervelo's claimed generational gain. Second, neither bike topped the table. The Factor ONE tested fastest at 198.2 W (196.8 W in 1x trim), with the Ridley Noah Fast at 202 W. So if you searched "fastest aero bike 2026" and landed here, the strict answer by TOUR's protocol is: neither of these. Which frees us up to ask the more interesting question. Which of these two is faster for you?

Aerodynamics: What the Wind Tunnel Actually Says

Start with the manufacturers' claims, because they frame the marketing war. Colnago says the Y1Rs saves 20 W over the V4Rs at 50 km/h at zero yaw, with 19% less frontal area. Cervelo claims the new S5 is 6.3 W faster at 50 km/h than its predecessor. Both claims are plausible against each brand's own older bikes. Neither tells you anything about the head-to-head.

The independent data does. Cyclingnews Labs tested both bikes in the same tunnel at 40 km/h with weighted yaw from -15° to +15°. Bike only, the Y1Rs measured 64.66 W (CdA 0.0786 m²) against the S5's 65.06 W (CdA 0.0790 m²). That's a nominal 0.40 W edge to the Colnago, and it sits inside the test's error margin. Call it what it is: a statistical tie.

Then Cyclingnews put a rider on board, and the result flipped. The S5 recorded 273.12 W to the Y1Rs' 276.78 W, a 3.66 W advantage to the Cervelo, with rider-on CdA of 0.3318 m² vs 0.3363 m². That S5 run was the fastest bike-plus-rider result Cyclingnews had ever recorded, statistically level with the Factor ONE. There's a lesson in that. A bike's job is to manage airflow around a rider, and the supposedly conservative S5 does that job at least as well as the radical Y-frame.

Test Protocol Y1Rs S5 Verdict
TOUR Magazin 2026 45 km/h, bike only 204 W 204 W Tie
Cyclingnews Labs 40 km/h, bike only 64.66 W 65.06 W Tie (within error)
Cyclingnews Labs 40 km/h, with rider 276.78 W 273.12 W S5 by 3.66 W
Manufacturer claim 50 km/h, vs own predecessor -20 W vs V4Rs -6.3 W vs old S5 Not comparable

One more nuance the spec sheets hide: wheels change the result. When Cyclingnews fitted identical ENVE SES 4.5 wheels to both, the Y1Rs improved to 64.14 W while the S5 got 0.43 W slower than on its stock Reserve wheels (~65.49 W). The S5 was designed around its Reserves; the Y1Rs has more to gain from an upgrade. If you're planning a custom build, that's a genuinely useful lever.

Grouped horizontal bar chart comparing Colnago Y1Rs and Cervelo S5 wind tunnel results across three test protocols — TOUR Magazin 45 km/h bike-only (204 W vs 204 W), Cyclingnews 40 km/h bike-only (64.66 W vs 65.06 W), and Cyclingnews 40 km/h with rider (276.78 W vs 273.12 W) — with the rider-on S5 bar highlighted and a callout noting "3.66 W advantage with rider aboard"
Grouped horizontal bar chart comparing Colnago Y1Rs and Cervelo S5 wind tunnel results across three test protocols — TOUR Magazin 45 km/h bike-only (204 W vs 204 W), Cyclingnews 40 km/h bike-only (64.66 W vs 65.06 W), and Cyclingnews 40 km/h with rider (276.78 W vs 273.12 W) — with the rider-on S5 bar highlighted and a callout noting "3.66 W advantage with rider aboard"

Weight: Claimed vs Real Builds

On paper, Colnago wins this one. The Y1Rs frame is a claimed 965 g (size M, unpainted) with a 450 g fork, 1,415 g for the pair. The S5's frame is 1,006 g with a 465 g fork, and Cervelo quotes the complete "system" (frame, fork, HB19 cockpit, post, hardware) at 2,032.3 g in 56 cm. A 41 g frame advantage to Italy.

Put the complete bikes on the scales, though, and it goes the other way. Across every published measured build, complete S5s come out 100–220 g lighter than comparable Y1Rs builds. The deeper S5 tubes carry less penalty than the Y1Rs' heavy proprietary cockpit and seatpost hardware. BikeRadar's direct pair made the point: 7.53 kg for a size-58 S5 against 7.66 kg for a size-L Y1Rs, both with Dura-Ace.

Bike / build Size Measured weight Source
Y1Rs, SRAM Red / Vision SC45 M 7.44 kg TOUR Magazin
Y1Rs, Dura-Ace Di2 L 7.66 kg BikeRadar
Y1Rs, tunnel test bike ~56 cm 7.68 kg Cyclingnews
S5, Dura-Ace / Reserve 56 7.44 kg Gran Fondo
S5, Red XPLR 1x13 (no pedals) 56 7.46 kg Cyclingnews
S5, Ultegra Di2 56 7.52 kg TOUR Magazin
S5, Dura-Ace Di2 58 7.53 kg BikeRadar
S5, Visma team spec (race-ready) 6.95 kg TOUR Magazin

The last row deserves a pause. Team Visma-Lease a Bike's race S5, built with 1x SRAM Red AXS and weighed with pedals, cages and computer mount, comes in at 6.95 kg. That's why Jonas Vingegaard rides the S5 even in the hardest climbing races: with the right parts, an aero bike now sits close enough to the UCI limit that a separate climbing frame is barely worth the swap. For amateur buyers the practical takeaway is simpler. Ignore claimed frame weights, compare complete builds, and on that measure the S5 is consistently the lighter bike.

Infographic contrasting "claimed vs real" weights — top half showing bare frame weights (Y1Rs 965 g vs S5 1,006 g, Colnago highlighted as winner), bottom half showing measured complete-build ranges (Y1Rs 7.44–7.68 kg vs S5 7.44–7.53 kg, Cervelo highlighted), with an arrow labeled "proprietary cockpit + hardware flip the result"
Infographic contrasting "claimed vs real" weights — top half showing bare frame weights (Y1Rs 965 g vs S5 1,006 g, Colnago highlighted as winner), bottom half showing measured complete-build ranges (Y1Rs 7.44–7.68 kg vs S5 7.44–7.53 kg, Cervelo highlighted), with an arrow labeled "proprietary cockpit + hardware flip the result"

Geometry and Fit: Nearly Twins, With One Big Trap

Read the geometry charts side by side and you'd swear these bikes were developed in the same CAD file. In size 54/M, the Y1Rs stacks 540 mm with a 386 mm reach against the S5's 542/384 mm, both with 73.0° head angles. In 56/L it's 565/395 mm vs 565/392 mm, both at 73.5°. The differences hide in the details: the Y1Rs runs 408 mm chainstays to the S5's 405 mm, a 72 mm bottom-bracket drop to the S5's 70 mm, and a steeper 73.7° effective seat angle against 73.0°.

Measure Y1Rs (M / 54) S5 (54) Y1Rs (L / 56) S5 (56)
Stack 540 mm 542 mm 565 mm 565 mm
Reach 386 mm 384 mm 395 mm 392 mm
Head angle 73.0° 73.0° 73.5° 73.5°
Chainstays 408 mm 405 mm 408 mm 405 mm
BB drop 72 mm 70 mm 72 mm 70 mm
Effective seat angle 73.7° 73.0° 73.7° 73.7°

The trap is the cockpit. The Y1Rs' CC.Y1 bar sweeps its "wings" dramatically forward. Those WYND profiles are there to cheat the wind, but the effect on fit is enormous. BikeRadar measured the equivalent of a ~140 mm stem on its size L, and Pogacar's own bar is a 145 mm 'stem' in the 377–400 mm width. Buy the Y1Rs off its frame-reach number and you may end up stretched 2 cm beyond your current position, with no cheap fix because the cockpit is proprietary. The S5's HB19 is more forgiving: three hood widths (36/38/40 cm) with flared drops 4 cm wider, on a conventional-length effective stem.

Fit checklist before you order either bike:

  1. Measure saddle-to-hood reach on your current bike, not frame reach. That's the number to match.
  2. On the Y1Rs, add the wing sweep. Treat the CC.Y1 as a 130–145 mm stem and check the total against your fit coordinates.
  3. Check the size runs. Colnago offers only 5 sizes (XS–XL); Cervelo offers 6 (48–61 cm). Riders at the extremes, very short or very tall, are more likely to find their size in the S5 range.
  4. Confirm cockpit availability in your width before paying a deposit. Both bars are one-piece, and swaps are expensive.
  5. If you run wide tires, remember the ceilings: 32 mm on the Y1Rs, 34 mm on the S5.
Side-view technical diagram of the Colnago Y1Rs CC.Y1 forward-swept cockpit overlaid on a conventional stem-and-bar silhouette, with a dimension line showing the ~140 mm effective stem length and an annotation reading "size from hood position, not frame reach"
Side-view technical diagram of the Colnago Y1Rs CC.Y1 forward-swept cockpit overlaid on a conventional stem-and-bar silhouette, with a dimension line showing the ~140 mm effective stem length and an annotation reading "size from hood position, not frame reach"

Design Philosophy: Radical Y vs Ruthless Refinement

These bikes reach nearly identical wind tunnel numbers from opposite directions, and the engineering story explains their characters. The Y1Rs is Colnago's clean-sheet gamble: a Y-shaped frame whose DEFY dual-Y seat-tube junction semi-decouples the seat structure, letting airflow pass through while adding a measure of compliance, plus a curved downtube that hugs the front wheel, proprietary aero bottle cages, and that forward-swept CC.Y1 cockpit. It looks like nothing else in the peloton. That's the point.

The S5 is the opposite doctrine: ruthless iteration of a proven platform. The signature bayonet fork carries on with deeper legs (worth ~57 g of added fork weight), the head and seat tubes got slimmer, the bottom bracket dropped 2 mm and the fork gained 0.5 mm of offset. Small changes, but they all point the same way: toward the modern trend of bigger rubber. Stock builds are optimized around 29 mm tires, with clearance to 34 mm against the Y1Rs' 32 mm. On real-world roads (chip seal, spring classics sportives, badly surfaced descents) those extra 2 mm and the calmer chassis are worth more than any single watt. If comfort matters more to you than raw speed, our aero vs endurance road bikes guide covers that fork in the road.

The drivetrain ecosystems diverge just as sharply. Colnago specs the Y1Rs exclusively with top-tier 2x electronic groupsets: Dura-Ace Di2 R9200, SRAM Red AXS, or, uniquely in this matchup, Campagnolo Super Record 13. There is no mid-range Y1Rs. That's deliberate. Cervelo's catalogue spans Dura-Ace Di2, Red AXS 2x, Red XPLR 1x13, Force AXS and Ultegra Di2. No Campagnolo, but a real ladder of price points, including a genuinely interesting 1x13 flagship for crit racers and flat-terrain riders.

Pro tip: the S5's one-piece HB19 accounts for roughly 100 g of the new bike's 124 g system saving and about 1 W of its aero gain. If you ever crash-replace it with a round-bar setup, you give most of that back. Budget for the proprietary part.

Side-by-side labeled diagram of the two frame philosophies — the Colnago Y1Rs Y-shaped frame with callouts for the DEFY dual-Y seat junction, curved downtube hugging the front wheel and forward-swept CC.Y1 cockpit, versus the Cervelo S5 with callouts for the bayonet fork, deeper head tube, HB19 one-piece cockpit and 34 mm tire clearance
Side-by-side labeled diagram of the two frame philosophies — the Colnago Y1Rs Y-shaped frame with callouts for the DEFY dual-Y seat junction, curved downtube hugging the front wheel and forward-swept CC.Y1 cockpit, versus the Cervelo S5 with callouts for the bayonet fork, deeper head tube, HB19 one-piece cockpit and 34 mm tire clearance

2026 Race Pedigree: Pogacar's Tour vs Van Aert's Roubaix

No comparison of these two is honest without the season that defined them. The Y1Rs' 2026 reads like a career. Pogacar won Milan–San Remo, the Tour of Flanders and Liège–Bastogne–Liège on it in the spring, then took his record-equalling fifth Tour de France, sealed 26 July, with five stage wins along the way. Colnago topped the Tour's brand count with six stage victories (Isaac del Toro added one aboard the V5Rs).

The S5's 2026 was shorter but no less pointed. Visma-Lease a Bike won the Tour's opening Barcelona team time trial on 4 July, putting Vingegaard in yellow with Pogacar 12 seconds back. The S5's aero credentials did exactly what they're sold to do. Pogacar answered on stage 6 (9 July), demolishing the field over the Col du Tourmalet to finish 2:38 ahead of Vingegaard, and the head-to-head ended for good when Vingegaard crashed out before stage 15 on 19 July. But the S5's defining win came earlier: Wout van Aert outsprinting Pogacar in the Roubaix velodrome to take Paris–Roubaix. An aero bike winning the hardest one-day race on the calendar, against the Y1Rs' own rider, head to head. For the full GC story, see our Pogacar vs Vingegaard vs Evenepoel Tour breakdown.

Two honest caveats before you let the palmarès pick your bike. First, pro results are dominated by legs, not frames. Pogacar would likely have won the Tour on either of these machines, and a structured training plan will buy you more speed than any frameset. Second, both platforms are now beyond question at the sport's highest level. UAE Team Emirates-XRG races Colnago (Y1Rs, V5Rs, TT1), Visma-Lease a Bike races Cervelo (S5, R5, P5), and Visma notably keeps Van Aert and Vingegaard on the S5 even for the hardest climbing races. Whatever you buy here, the pros have already stress-tested it for you.

Price and Builds in 2026: Where the Money Goes

Here the gap is unambiguous. The Y1Rs frameset kit (frame, fork, CC.Y1 cockpit, DEFY post and integrated cages) launched at $6,750 and now typically sells for $7,500 in the US, around €6,710 in Europe. The S5 frameset is $6,500 / €5,999. That's roughly $1,000 less, with change left for a power meter.

Build Spec highlights USD EUR
Y1Rs frameset kit Frame, fork, cockpit, post, cages $7,500 ~€6,710
Y1Rs Red AXS Vision SC45 wheels from $14,329 €12,300
Y1Rs Super Record 13 Bora Ultra WTO wheels €16,500
Y1Rs Dura-Ace / ENVE SES 4.5 Team-level build $18,399
S5 frameset Frame, fork, HB19, post $6,500 €5,999
S5 Ultegra Di2 Entry electronic build ~$8,500 €9,999
S5 Force AXS Mid-tier SRAM ~$9,500 €10,299
S5 Red AXS 2x / Red XPLR 1x13 Flagship SRAM options $14,250 €13,999

Two rows tell the story. The S5's Ultegra Di2 build at ~$8,500 has no Y1Rs answer at all; Colnago's cheapest complete bike costs nearly $6,000 more. And at the top, BikeRadar's like-for-like £12,000 comparison found the S5 shipped with a 4iiii power meter and higher-grade Reserve wheels while the Y1Rs came with mid-level Vision SC45s and no meter. Same money, measurably more bike. Now factor in the wheel-interaction data from the aero section. The Y1Rs needs a wheel upgrade to hit its best numbers, while the S5 is already optimized on its stock Reserves, so the real-world price gap widens further. If team-replica shopping is your angle, our guide to buying the actual pro bikes of the 2026 Tour maps every team machine to its consumer model.

Which One Should You Buy?

The reviews converge on a clear pattern, and it's worth stating before the checklists. BikeRadar's direct head-to-head crowned the S5 its 2025 Race Bike of the Year: more planted in crosswinds, stiffer through the bottom bracket, better specced for the money, with the Y1Rs judged the more agile bike. In its Cervelo S5 review, Cyclingnews called the bike "blisteringly fast but disconcertingly placid" and rated it probably the best all-round aero race bike for most conditions. Its Colnago Y1Rs review scored 78%, praising speed on flat and rolling terrain but flagging the price and day-to-day practicality. TOUR Magazin graded the Y1Rs 2.1: first-class aero, unique design, but marked down on stability and comfort, at an extreme price.

Choose the Cervelo S5 if:

  • You want the fastest real-world package. The rider-on data and the calmer handling both favor it
  • Value matters even at superbike prices (power meter and better wheels included; frameset $1,000 cheaper)
  • You ride rough roads or want 34 mm tire clearance
  • You want an entry point under $10k (Ultegra Di2 ~$8,500) or a 1x13 flagship
  • You sit at the sizing extremes and need the 48 or 61 cm options

Choose the Colnago Y1Rs if:

  • You want the most distinctive superbike at any group ride. Nothing else looks like it
  • Agility and razor handling matter more to you than crosswind stability
  • You want Campagnolo Super Record 13, which Cervelo doesn't offer
  • The Pogacar connection and Colnago's 2026 palmarès genuinely add value for you
  • You're planning a custom wheel upgrade anyway (the Y1Rs gains more from ENVE SES 4.5s than the S5 does)

Still torn? Apply the tiebreaker in order. Fit first: the Y1Rs' effective ~140 mm stem disqualifies it for some riders before money even enters the discussion. Budget second: the S5 wins every tier. Heart last. And if the heart still says Colnago after all that, you'll regret nothing. These are the two best aero race bikes of the 2026 season. There is no wrong answer here, only a smarter one.

Decision flowchart for choosing between the Colnago Y1Rs and Cervelo S5, starting with "Does a ~140 mm effective stem fit your position?", branching through budget under $10k, tire clearance needs above 32 mm, Campagnolo preference, and exclusivity vs value priorities, ending in two outcome boxes labeled "Cervelo S5" and "Colnago Y1Rs"
Decision flowchart for choosing between the Colnago Y1Rs and Cervelo S5, starting with "Does a ~140 mm effective stem fit your position?", branching through budget under $10k, tire clearance needs above 32 mm, Campagnolo preference, and exclusivity vs value priorities, ending in two outcome boxes labeled "Cervelo S5" and "Colnago Y1Rs"

Frequently Asked Questions

Q: Which is faster, the Colnago Y1Rs or the Cervelo S5? A: Without a rider they are statistically tied. TOUR Magazin's 2026 tunnel test measured 204 W apiece at 45 km/h, and Cyclingnews got 64.66 W vs 65.06 W at 40 km/h, within the error margin. With a rider aboard, the S5 was 3.66 W faster (273.12 W vs 276.78 W) in Cyclingnews' test, the fastest bike-plus-rider result it had ever recorded.

Q: What bike does Tadej Pogacar ride in 2026? A: The Colnago Y1Rs for most races, with the V5Rs as his climbing option. He won the 2026 Tour de France (his record-equalling fifth) plus Milan–San Remo, the Tour of Flanders and Liège–Bastogne–Liège on the Y1Rs.

Q: What bike does Jonas Vingegaard ride? A: The Cervelo S5, even in the hardest climbing races. Visma-Lease a Bike's race build gets down to 6.95 kg ready to ride. He wore yellow after the S5-powered Barcelona team time trial win at the 2026 Tour before crashing out ahead of stage 15.

Q: How much do the Colnago Y1Rs and Cervelo S5 cost in 2026? A: The Y1Rs frameset kit runs $7,500 (~€6,710), with complete builds from about $14,329 to $18,399. The S5 frameset is $6,500 (€5,999); complete builds span roughly $8,500 (Ultegra Di2) to $14,250 (Red AXS or Red XPLR 1x13), with the Dura-Ace flagship around $14,100–$14,350.

Q: What is the fastest aero road bike in 2026? A: By TOUR Magazin's 2026 bike-only ranking, the Factor ONE (198.2 W at 45 km/h), ahead of the Ridley Noah Fast (202 W) and the tied Y1Rs and S5 (204 W each). With a rider aboard, Cyclingnews found the Cervelo S5 the fastest bike-plus-rider combination it had ever tested, statistically level with the Factor ONE.

Q: What tire clearance do the Y1Rs and S5 have? A: 32 mm on the Colnago Y1Rs, 34 mm on the Cervelo S5. The current S5 was also tweaked for bigger rubber, with a 2 mm lower bottom bracket and 0.5 mm more fork offset, and stock builds optimized around 29 mm tires.

Q: Is the Colnago Y1Rs worth it over the Cervelo S5? A: Only if exclusivity, agility, Campagnolo compatibility or the Pogacar connection carry real weight for you. The S5 is faster with a rider aboard, 100–220 g lighter in comparable builds, about $1,000 cheaper at frameset level, better equipped at the same price, and it won BikeRadar's direct head-to-head.

Q: Can you buy Pogacar's actual Tour de France bike? A: In spec, yes. The Y1Rs he raced is the retail model, and Colnago sells UAE team-edition paint. A team-level Dura-Ace Di2 build with ENVE SES 4.5 wheels lists at about $18,399 in the US.

The Bottom Line

Strip away the paint and the storylines and the 2026 data says this: the radical Colnago Y1Rs and the refined Cervelo S5 arrive at the same aerodynamic destination, and once a rider joins the system, the Cervelo is measurably the faster, lighter, cheaper and more practical machine. That's why it won the head-to-head reviews. It's also why the rational recommendation here is the S5, at whichever of its five build tiers your budget reaches.

But superbikes were never entirely rational purchases. The Y1Rs just carried the greatest rider of this generation to a fifth Tour de France, it looks like nothing else on the road, and it out-handles the Cervelo when the road turns. If that's what gets you out the door at 6 a.m., the spreadsheet loses. Check the fit numbers first, especially that ~140 mm effective stem. Then buy the bike you'll actually ride.

SOUVISEJÍCÍ ČLÁNKY